Diederick C. Niehorster (12023-05-01): > +1. Thanks.
> I assume a lot of the AVDocNode can be automatically populated from its > corresponding option? We'd not want to maintain, e.g. option names and > aliases in more than one place. I cannot promise there will be no duplication at all, and AVOption is very limited and needs to be replaced anyway. But I can promise it will not have to be written as a C structure with all its fields initialized. I have not discussed it nor finalized any of the details, but I am thinking the build system will parse either doxy-style comments in the C source code or in a separate .md file with the same name to generate the structures for the built-in documentation. If the system parses comments in the C source, it can also parse the AVOption initializers, at least in the simple cases. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
