On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 4:07 AM Xiang, Haihao <haihao.xiang-at-intel....@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > From: Haihao Xiang <haihao.xi...@intel.com> > > Intel MediaSDK and oneVPL expect contiguous allocation for data[i], > however there are mandatory padding bytes between data[i] and data[i+1]. > when calling av_frame_get_buffer. So adding av_frame_get_buffer2 to > allow caller to specify the length of padding bytes. >
get_video_buffer will also pad the height to a multiple of 32, won't that again cause issues? I don't think the API even necessarily guarantees that its going to be one contiguous buffer, it just happens to be the way its made right now. If a new API is introduced, maybe it should be very tailor designed to offer these guarantees, and named appropriate, not introducing any padding - padded height or extra padding, or otherwise. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".