On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:41:59AM +0000, Schenk, Michael wrote: > Hi, > In general it's a good and useful feature iterating to the next sequence if > open_input failes. But if the application is using > the abort callback possibility we shall be aware of this and returning with a > meaningful error code, otherwise we > just increases sequence numbers. > > Feedback for sure is warmly welcome. > > Regards > > Michael
> hls.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > e55fe84fa0c4dcb0708b58cd9751e249e7004d1d > 0001-do-not-iterate-to-next-sequence-number-if-interrupte.patch > From c70f203a0ee5a0ba407525cbbe9fe2a284c9da2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: schenk michael <michael.sch...@albistechnologies.com> > Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 06:20:34 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] do not iterate to next sequence number if interrupted is > requested applied thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB it is not once nor twice but times without number that the same ideas make their appearance in the world. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
