Anton Khirnov (12023-09-26): > It is not. From my perspective, the objections to SDR have been largely > technical
We have not read the same discussion. The objections to SDR start and end at “it does not belong in FFmpeg”, which is not a technical objection but an aesthetic one. Furthermore, the way these objections were stated made it quite obvious the motivation behind them was that they wanted Michael to spend his time on more useful tasks. More useful for them, implicitly. Again, that is not technical, that is egoistical. Last, there have been some suggestions or demands, technical indeed, that looked like openings for compromise. But the same people who made them made it clear in other parts of the discussion they had no intention of meeting anybody on any kind of middle ground. Given the disingenuousness of these demands, I think Michael is entitled to feel a little paranoid. -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
