Hi,
sorry can't comment on the ML atm as people will wonder why I respond to this
but not to other "more important" mails...
Set aside that I think its complete nonsense not to share the list of mail
addresses directly for any legal consideration - all these mail addresses were
put into a public repo and used on a public ML and there is no reason not to
reshare public info. However if people (next to JB who I don't believe is
actually having any legal considerations...) don't like it...
The script should output two files then, so that no manual editing is required.
The voting system expects a file with mail addresses one per line and the ML
then shall be given the very same list but with only the names.
Therefore I think the script should just output two files, ga_names.txt and
ga_mails.txt.
Thanks for the patch!
-Thilo
Am 03.11.23 um 20:18 schrieb Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel:
On Nov 3, 2023, at 11:40 AM, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
This is also changing the sort order. It might be acceptable but it
might also not be.
It is and I probably should have called that out in the description. If the
goal is to publish mostly names and not emails in various places like this list
then it seems sorting by name would be more natural. But I'm happy to to update
the patch with whatever sort order we want to use.
- Cosmin
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
