On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 17:21, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 01:21:13PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: >> Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2023-11-09 12:55:25) >> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 10:44:12AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: >> > > As nobody expressed a preference, the vote will start next Monday >> > > (2023-11-13). It should run for a week, and will be followed by TC/CC >> > > elections. >> > > >> > > The only extra GA candidate I see proposed so far is Ronald. If anyone >> > > wants to suggest further people, please do so in this thread ASAP. >> > >> > IMHO the question of the relation of the list of people who could vote >> > in the last GA vote and the people who where in the general assembly >> > in 2020 should be awnsered before further votes. >> > https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2023-November/316609.html >> >> As far as I can tell, the voter list in the last vote should be the same >> as the GA from 2020, except for the extra members whose voting rights >> expire after 2 years. >> >> Do you dispute that? > > There are at least 3 issues here > > * The first and maybe the biggest, is that our vote superviser can reply to > mails within 20min (like in this thread here) but is not replying to a > simple > question within days where the list of voters comes from he used and how it
WTF are you talking about ? WTF are you attacking me on my email response time? > relates to the 2020 GA. It gives one the feeling he has some sort of > difficulty with awnsering that question > you took a guess here and replied, and i appreciate that. But really JB > choose this list and also the one in 2020. Only he can explain where these I choose nothing. I got the list that was provided to me for the first vote, after the script was written. I did not write the script, I did not run the script. Would you stop smearing me? This is absolutely unacceptable. A contrario from you, I am not part of the GA and I don’t have voting rights… > * The 2nd issue is that there are rules how to change the GA over time No they don’t. We discussed and voted a way, and after years it seems it was not clear enough for some people. > Now we are here trying the 3rd variant of applying > only half the rules. So what? The previous way was not clear enough for people, so we vote for a new way. And it was accepted quite largely against the other options. > Not stating upfront what this list is > IMO this is not acceptable for a vote. How so? Do you go to and see the list of all the voters in Austria before doing a vote ? Especially, here, it is to bootstrap a new way of voting. If the vote was close, maybe there could be discussion, but here, this is not the case. And stop smearing me in the mud. -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President +33 672 704 734 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
