> -----Original Message----- > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Anton > Khirnov > Sent: 2023年11月11日 15:58 > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Repeat vote: GA voters list updates > > Quoting Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel (2023-11-11 08:22:19) > > Hi, > > > > in [1] JB listed his list of authorized voters for the "GA voters list > > updates" > > vote. > > > > This list does not correlate with the list Josh provided in [2]. > > The word 'correlate' does not mean what you seem to think it means. The > list does correlate. > > > Neither does this list of 51 people [1] correlate to the 54 authorized > > voters > > (distinct email addresses) the CIVS system actually counted, see [3]. > > > > This can mean only one of two things, either some people on the list in [1] > > did > > receive more than one ballot, or JB failed to list all the authorized > > voters and > > ballots have been given to unknown people. Both possibilities are > > unacceptable > > flaws for a democratic vote. > > > > As the admin responsible of the votes it is my duty to have supervision of > > all > > polls and thus it is my duty to declare this vote null and void for the > > flaws > > given above. > > I am not aware of anyone having given you the right to do this. > > > mich...@niedermayer.cc > > one...@gmail.com > > jamr...@gmail.com > > andreas.rheinha...@gmail.com > > s...@jkqxz.net > > c...@passwd.hu > > ceffm...@gmail.com > > barryjz...@tencent.com > > liuq...@kuaishou.com > > lance.lmw...@gmail.com > > martin.vign...@gmail.com > > ffm...@gyani.pro > > a...@tmm1.net > > mar...@martin.st > > di...@biurrun.de > > lizhong1...@gmail.com > > d...@lynne.ee > > nfx...@googlemail.com > > an...@khirnov.net > > atomnu...@gmail.com > > t...@rothenpieler.org > > u...@pkh.me > > geo...@nsup.org > > yejun....@intel.com > > linjie...@intel.com > > kaustubh.ra...@imgtec.com > > stebb...@jetheaddev.com > > phil...@overt.org > > andriy.gel...@gmail.com > > vittorio.giov...@gmail.com > > jerome.borsb...@carpalis.nl > > derek.buitenh...@gmail.com > > pr...@xvid.org > > j...@itanimul.li > > kjeya...@akamai.com > > dalecur...@chromium.org > > jee...@gmail.com > > t.r...@noa-archive.com > > vdi...@akamai.com > > zhiliz...@tencent.com > > matthieu.bou...@gmail.com > > yinshiyou...@loongson.cn > > z...@zanevaniperen.com > > ruiling.s...@intel.com > > kjeya...@akamai.com > > hwr...@126.com > > modma...@google.com > > c...@gmx.com > > fooba...@gmail.com > > baptiste.coudur...@gmail.com > > This list contains at least two duplicates, easily found by inspection. > This gives me zero confidence that any hypothetical new vote would be > any more reliable than the old one. > > Also as I said before, option A won its contests against options B/C/D > by 17/7, 23/1, and 17/7, respectively. You would thus need to change 10 > votes to have any chance of a different result. As the number of > disputed voters is nowhere near 10, there is no point in repeating > anything.
I abstain if there will another vote. I can't believe how much time have been taken on this than do some real work, like coding and patch review, and improve the situation of patch review. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
