func ff_decorrelate_sm_rvv, zve32x
1:
vsetvli t0, a2, e32, m8, ta, ma
vle32.v v8, (a1)
sub a2, a2, t0
vle32.v v0, (a0)
vssra.vi v8, v8, 1
vsub.vv v16, v0, v8
vse32.v v16, (a0)
sh2add a0, t0, a0
vadd.vv v16, v0, v8
vse32.v v16, (a1)
sh2add a1, t0, a1
bnez a2, 1b
ret
endfunc
Is this way? In this situation, or when using vsra, there will be some
tests that fail, and the result value differs by 1. I'm not sure where the
problem..
Rémi Denis-Courmont <[email protected]> 于2023年12月22日周五 00:08写道：
> Le maanantaina 18. joulukuuta 2023, 17.16.27 EET flow gg a écrit :
> > C908:
> > decorrelate_sm_c: 130.0
> > decorrelate_sm_rvv_i32: 43.7
>
> +
> +func ff_decorrelate_sm_rvv, zve32x
> +1:
> + vsetvli t0, a2, e32, m8, ta, ma
> + vle32.v v0, (a0)
> + sub a2, a2, t0
> + vle32.v v8, (a1)
> + vsra.vi v16, v8, 1
>
> You should load v8 first, since it is used as input before v0.
>
> + vsub.vv v0, v0, v16
> + vse32.v v0, (a0)
> + sh2add a0, t0, a0
> + vadd.vv v0, v0, v8
>
> You can use VSSRA, and then VADD won't need to depend on the output of
> VSUB.
>
> + vse32.v v0, (a1)
> + sh2add a1, t0, a1
> + bnez a2, 1b
> + ret
> +endfunc
>
> --
> 雷米‧德尼-库尔蒙
> http://www.remlab.net/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
