Hello, On Thu, 8 Feb 2024, at 01:36, Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel wrote: >> There were simply no objections to moving to C11. >> The C17 plan came about later because it has important bugfixes. >> It doesn't really matter as compilers backported the new behaviour to C11 >> (or rather, they consistently had the same behaviour, but now it became a >> standard). >> > > There were no objections to C11, however C17 was brought up and there > were objections that it's likely too soon and I believe JB proposed > holding off for a year on C17 (while adopting C11 immediately), which
My recommendation is still this: - move to C11 now - activate C17 on some Fate/CI targets - recommend C17 compilers modes - move to C17 at this mid-year when 7.1 is branched (LTS if we follow our plans) -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President +33 672 704 734 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".