Le tiistaina 27. helmikuuta 2024, 0.44.37 EET Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> > --- > doc/community.texi | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/doc/community.texi b/doc/community.texi > index 8a38c6aca0..fc22a8fa61 100644 > --- a/doc/community.texi > +++ b/doc/community.texi > @@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ If the TC thinks it needs the input from the larger > community, the TC can call f > > Each TC member must vote on such decision according to what is, in their > view, best for the project. > > +If a TC member is aware of a conflict of interest with regards to the case, > they must announce it > +and recuse themselves from the TC discussion and vote.
It looks like the meaning and intent do not match up here. I would expect something like either of: * If a TC member is aware of being in a conflict of interest with regards to the case, they must announce it and recuse themselves from the TC discussion and vote. * If a TC member is aware of a conflict of interest with regards to the case, they must announce it and the conflicted TC member(s) must recuse themselves from the TC discussion and vote. But either way this leaves open what you do if somebody outside the TC asserts a conflict of interest against a TC member, or worse, if a conflict of interest is asserted post-facto. So in the end, while this rule seems well-meaning and agreeable, I don't see how you can avoid having conflicted TC member vote. Consequently, this should be a strong recommendation rather than a strict rule. Again, the effective way to work-around this problem is to keep a large and diverse enough TC membership to offset the one or few hypothetical dishonest votes. -- 雷米‧德尼-库尔蒙 http://www.remlab.net/ _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
