On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 12:53:59AM +0200, wm4 wrote: [...] > This is a bit too long and redundant with the new paragraphs added. I > don't understand why you felt the need to redo this at all (including > reverting the already pushed announcement). >
It was committed without review from the ffmpeg team, and raised objections from at least 4 persons in the next minutes. As a result, it was reverted so we could take more time to think about it. Most of the authors were unknown, and the other rage quitted. It was done in order to prevent the flame to heat up. I know my English is bad and maybe too direct (and it was done in a hurry in order to calm down angry spirits that left), so the original wording is currently reworked by Lydia (thank you) and a proper review will be done. Regards, -- Clément B.
pgpA1rHsnFQn5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
