On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 05:07:58PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > Hey, > > I've offered on IRC already, but I figured doing it formally on the ML > is probably best. > > I would be willing to take over doing the merges from Libav for the > time being, until we decide otherwise, and on top I can probably spare > some time reviewing and handling patches submitted to the ML as the > need arises. > > I've been developing with and for FFmpeg for many years, and I feel > confident I'm up to the task, and should just step up and do it.
Thanks alot ! Also a technical comment, about fate suite, i never bothered waiting for it to sync before merging a commit. I dont think that extra constraint is important. almost all fate clients we have can handle 0-latency fate suite updates, aka they will update git and rsync at the same time. The very few which dont would have a new test or 2 fail for a round, this is in practice basically irrelevant. One can clearly see that the failures are due to a missing file and so noone should be confused or waste time on them [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel