On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 09:19:46PM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > C code or compiler built-ins are preferable over inline assembler for > byte-swaps as it allows for better optimisations (e.g. instruction > scheduling) which would otherwise be impossible. > > As with f64c2e710fa1a7b59753224e717f57c48462076f for x86 and Arm, > this removes the inline assembler on GCC (and Clang) since we now > require recent enough compiler versions (this indeed seems to work on > AArch64). > --- > libavutil/aarch64/bswap.h | 56 --------------------------------------- > libavutil/avr32/bswap.h | 44 ------------------------------ > libavutil/bswap.h | 8 +----- > libavutil/sh4/bswap.h | 48 ---------------------------------
As you are writing that this preferrable for better optimisations Please provide benchmarks (for sh4, avr32) thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Democracy is the form of government in which you can choose your dictator
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
