On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 2:24 AM WATANABE Osamu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Pierre, Tomas, > > For lossy codestreams, I found a potential problem on the current 9x7 integer > IDWT (which will be activated with the +bitexact flag.)
Probably related? https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/10123 > > I have confirmed that FFMPEG passes all the test cases without the flag. > > The problem has been locally solved with the updated code, however, the patch > set is not yet ready. > (It won't take long) > > Best, > Osamu > > > > 2024/08/22 1:01、Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <[email protected]>のメール: > > > > ?On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 8:54?AM Tomas Hardin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> man 2024-08-19 klockan 23:03 -0700 skrev [email protected]: > >>> From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> --- > >>> tests/fate/jpeg2000.mak | 129 > >> > >> I presume you've tested that the frames match the references as > >> required. If so then it looks OK to me > > > > @osamu you checked that all the codestreams decoded within acceptable > > limits, right? If so, I will add you as co-author. > > > > (I have only checked a few of them for accuracy per the spec. I have > > checked all of them for memory leaks/crashes.) > > > >> > >> /Tomas > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > >> > >> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > >> [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
