On 28/02/2025 03:33, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 03:25:06AM +0100, Lynne wrote:
On 27/02/2025 02:10, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc>
---
   doc/developer.texi | 11 +++++------
   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi
index a1bfe180c9b..6a753f99da6 100644
--- a/doc/developer.texi
+++ b/doc/developer.texi
@@ -179,18 +179,17 @@ int fields = ilace ? 2 : 1;
   @end example
   @item
-No braces around single-line blocks:
+No braces around single-line blocks, unless they are followed by an else (to 
keep future patches cleaner)
   @example c, good
   // Good
-if (bits_pixel == 24)
+if (bits_pixel == 24) @{
       avctx->pix_fmt = AV_PIX_FMT_BGR24;
-else if (bits_pixel == 8)
+@} else if (bits_pixel == 8) @{
       avctx->pix_fmt = AV_PIX_FMT_GRAY8;
-else @{
-    av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "Invalid pixel format.\n");
+@} else
       return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA;
-@}
+
   @end example
   @item

Strongly objecting to this patch. It's all over our codebase, and I like it.
Literally everywhere you look.
If future patches need to add more under the branch, then it only needs to
be done once.

Such fundamental changes need more than a single patch hastily accepted, and
should involve the community as a whole, I believe.

Its not a change, look at tools/patcheck

or try:

+    if(this)
+        that
+    else
+        nothat
+

patcheck reports:

missing } prior to else
patcheck.stdout:11:+    else

missing whitespace between keyword and ( (feel free to ignore)
patcheck.stdout:9:+    if(this)

Ah, okay. I didn't read properly. The double negative in the sentence makes it hard to understand.

Rather than
> No braces around single-line blocks, unless they are followed by an else (to keep future patches cleaner)

Consider
> Don't wrap single-line blocks in braces. Use braces only if there is an accompanying else statement. This keeps future code changes easier to keep track of.

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xA2FEA5F03F034464.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to