> On Jun 15, 2025, at 23:17, Andreas Rheinhardt > <andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote: > > Zhao Zhili: >>> Otherwise the extradata used would be ISOBMFF if the input is >>> even though we use the *_mp4toannexb BSFs to convert it to >>> annex B to feed it to the actual decoder. >>> >>> (The mediacodec decoders also use said BSFs, yet they process >>> the extradata in a way that works even when using the ISOBMFF >>> extradata; in fact, using the converted extradata would break >>> their check for whether to warn for missing extradata for >>> the ISOBMFF without-in-band-header profiles. >>> >>> Furthermore, there are several users of the *_mp4toannexb BSFs >>> that don't ever touch extradata. They have not been touched.) >> >> The solution is fragile and easy to be broken. It doesn’t look like a better >> solution than avcodec_parameters_to_context. >> > > Do you still think this way in light of my reply > (https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2025-June/344986.html)? >
Please apply. > - Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
