On 8 Jul 2025, at 16:54, Devin Heitmueller wrote:

> Hi Matt,
>
> Thanks for your contribution.  Comments inline.
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 9:40 PM Matt via ffmpeg-devel
> <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
>> diff --git a/libavdevice/decklink_enc.cpp b/libavdevice/decklink_enc.cpp
>> index cb8f91730e..5751f27de8 100644
>> --- a/libavdevice/decklink_enc.cpp
>> +++ b/libavdevice/decklink_enc.cpp
>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>>   */
>>
>>  #include <atomic>
>> +#include <unistd.h>
>
> Not needed (see below)
>
>>  using std::atomic;
>>
>>  /* Include internal.h first to avoid conflict between winsock.h (used by
>> @@ -369,11 +370,26 @@ av_cold int ff_decklink_write_trailer(AVFormatContext 
>> *avctx)
>>  {
>>      struct decklink_cctx *cctx = (struct decklink_cctx *)avctx->priv_data;
>>      struct decklink_ctx *ctx = (struct decklink_ctx *)cctx->ctx;
>> +    uint32_t buffered;

Can be moved inside the while block to narrow the scope.

>>
>>      if (ctx->playback_started) {
>>          BMDTimeValue actual;
>>          ctx->dlo->StopScheduledPlayback(ctx->last_pts * ctx->bmd_tb_num,
>>                                          &actual, ctx->bmd_tb_den);
>> +        av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_DEBUG, "Stopped at %ld, requested %ld\n", 
>> actual, ctx->last_pts * ctx->bmd_tb_num);
>> +        while (1){
>> +            ctx->dlo->GetBufferedVideoFrameCount(&buffered);
>> +            if (buffered <= 0){
>> +                break;
>> +            }
>> +            av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_DEBUG, "Waiting for %d buffered frames to 
>> finish\n", buffered);
>> +            if (buffered < 5) {
>> +                usleep(1);
>> +            } else {
>> +                usleep(300);
>> +            }
>
> The sleep calls should use av_usleep(), which is portable and you
> don't need unistd.h.  Also, there should be some limit so that it
> doesn't block forever if video frames are scheduled very far in the
> future (e.g. after 1 second, give up and log a warning).
>

I think even if a frame is schedule "far" in the future, if I want them
all played out then it should probably still wait, no? As what is considered
"far" is a matter of interpretation…

Also there should likely be an option to opt in to this new behavior?

> Devin
>
> -- 
> Devin Heitmueller, Senior Software Engineer
> LTN Global Communications
> o: +1 (301) 363-1001
> w: https://ltnglobal.com  e: devin.heitmuel...@ltnglobal.com
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to