Hi On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 02:06:07PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler via ffmpeg-devel wrote: [...]
> > I thought Forgejo had votes as well, but I can't find them anymore, so I > might be misremembering that. One can add thumbs up and down to individual messages of an issue but they are not shown in the search results or searchable as far as i can see In fact the whole search capability in Forgejo is disappointing even searching for open (not new) tickets doesnt work as documented (one cannot disable "new" lables by alt + mouse click it works by alt + keyboard click) > But the usual issue conclusions are represented via labels, and they do > exist. And have been used for that purpose already. > Not sure I'd really want to stick with hard to maintain trac just for voting > on issues. If we really want that, it'd probably easier to contribute that > feature to Forgejo. > > I'm also not a fan of migrating issues, since the migrates one are always > going to be horribly ugly, basically just consisting of one big quote posted > by a bot account. > It is possible to do though, so if that's desired instead of keeping trac > itself around, I can look into it. Naively, i would have thought that issue migration would be done by a Database -> Database thing but there are many shades of this one could leave issues in trac and instead extend Forgejos search so it simply in addition to what it does also have it run a sql querry in the trac db and simply return links to the trac tickets this actually feels like quite doable for someone knowing Forgejo and also the trac db layout. (that is not me) thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB If a bugfix only changes things apparently unrelated to the bug with no further explanation, that is a good sign that the bugfix is wrong.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-le...@ffmpeg.org
