On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:49:00 +0200 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > Hi all > > 2 months ago we voted on testing Forgejo vs Gitlab, we picked and tested > Forgejo. And as said in that vote, (and surprisingly, i have not forgotten it) > heres the "after testing" discussion and vote > > do we want to keep Forgejo or switch back to the ML workflow > (or something else) > > F. keep Forgejo as primary forge for patch/git workflow > M. switch back to the ML for patch/git workflow
F, with strong preference. I am neutral on the issue of where to have bug tracking for the time being. I am also neutral on GitLab vs ForgeJo - I think both systems have their strengths and weaknesses, although it appears simpler to smooth out ForgeJo's bugs than to modify GitLab's monolithic codebase. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-le...@ffmpeg.org
