On 1/9/2026 7:32 AM, Nicolas Gaullier via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
On 1/8/26 08:32, Christophe Gisquet via ffmpeg-devel wrote:Le jeu. 8 janv. 2026, 02:24, mypopy--- via ffmpeg-devel < [email protected]> a écrit :Well, I don't particularly like that argument (flv extension again by someAs James Almer pointed out in his response, the current merge request has already removed the muxer component, so there won't be any compatibility issues, even if the specification is still in draft status.AV1 in TS is already being utilized in certain scenarios, and we also need an implementation to validate this specification concurrentlyoperator?), but this is beside the point.I also don't particularly like that argument, but what I do not understand is why we cannot get a public sample for sharing ?
Kieran is trying to get one.
It seems to me this demuxer-case should require FF_COMPLIANCE_EXPERIMENTAL.
Why would a demuxer require the user to set that compliance value? Muxers i understand, but demuxers? Is there ever any reason you'd not want to have it output something it can handle?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
