Hi Niklas On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 06:55:42PM +0100, Niklas Haas via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026, at 5:42 PM, Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > > Also, many of us are not deeply familiar with the tradeoffs of all > > these choices, and 48 hours is not much time for everyone to stop other > > work and evaluate them properly. > > The discussion has been ongoing for over a week, not 48 hours.
If you are fine with the subtree suggestion I outlined, and nobody objects to it, then I would be happy to approve a corresponding PR immediately in 24-48h Otherwise, if there is disagreement, then I think we should first identify exactly what the disagreement is and why. Voting makes sense when we fail to resolve a disagreement. But at the moment I am not even sure that such a disagreement exists. I have seen several people speak against submodules. I have also seen concerns about importing 600+ commits, and concerns about merge-heavy history. The question now is whether these are actual objections to a full-history subtree approach. If they are real objections, then we should discuss them and understand each other better first. If they are not, then we can move forward That seems faster and more productive than voting before the actual points of disagreement are clear. thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB If you think the mosad wants you dead since a long time then you are either wrong or dead since a long time.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
