Hi, 2015-09-22 14:21 GMT+02:00 Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me>: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 08:27:47PM +0100, Kieran Kunhya wrote: >> > This "decision" thingy, is intended to confirm that >> > * Stuff should be moved to the telepoint server, possibly duplicates >> > should be left at/moved to the hetzner server for redundancy, if >> > this is technically possible (maybe it should be called copy instead >> > of move in that case) >> >> As discussed at VDD15 and posted to the admin IRC and emailed to the >> root email address: >> It was agreed by a large group of developers that this should be put >> on hold and videolan remain a valid option. >> > > Well, to be completely honest, it was Ronald & you mainly, the rest of the > people in the room remained mostly silent, and it was about "a random > server in Hungary [or sth like this] no ones know anything about". > > It was also raised the fact that using Videolan infrastructure needs a lot > of work for the admins, for which most of us couldn't really say much > about it.
That's probably part of the issue. Is there actually a precise list of tasks that are needed to achieve the transition to VideoLAN's infrastructure (Docker, etc.). From what I understood, the transition is not impossible, "just" that nobody has time/desire/skills to migrate everything in one-shot. The bug tracking system was also an issue since videolan's trac instance was to be decommissioned. Maybe if there was a well defined list of things to would make it clearer to estimate the transition cost? And, in the worst case, it's not as if VideoLabs was hosted in a famous hoster in France, and probably some help could be gathered from there independently as a service? :) > >> You can't just make these unilateral decisions. >> > > We have a voting committee in order to make decision with a much better > "large group of developers" defined, that's what this thread is about. > > That said, on a personal note I'm pretty much neutral about the decision > taken as long as I'm not asked to do any work, so I have no opinion on > which servers to keep or use in the future. > >> Kieran > > -- > Clément B. > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
