On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@mit.edu> wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@mit.edu> >> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@mit.edu> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> >> wrote: >> >>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 07:27:03PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> >> >>>>> --- >> >>>>> libavcodec/apedec.c | 2 +- >> >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >>>> >> >>>> breaks fate >> >>>> >> >>>> --- ./tests/ref/fate/lossless-monkeysaudio-399 2015-09-29 >> 13:42:22.893972599 +0200 >> >>>> +++ tests/data/fate/lossless-monkeysaudio-399 2015-09-30 >> 03:06:06.950988548 +0200 >> >>>> @@ -1 +1 @@ >> >>>> -a28d4e5f2192057f7d4bece870f40bd0 >> >>>> +df8663c29d7cd7268d6ae77edd742bb5 >> >>>> Test lossless-monkeysaudio-399 failed. Look at >> tests/data/fate/lossless-monkeysaudio-399.err for details. >> >>>> make: *** [fate-lossless-monkeysaudio-399] Error 1 >> >>> >> >>> Weird, unfortunately for whatever reason my fate does not test this >> >>> (though apedec gets compiled) so I can't reproduce. One suggestion I >> >>> have is removing the U at the end, that will prevent any unforeseen >> >>> signed/unsigned business which I thought was ok. Please change the >> >>> author tag if you do this. >> >> >> >> updated patch removing the U; like I said my fate does not test it so >> >> it only has been compile tested. >> >> >> > >> > You should figure out whats wrong with your FATE, the ape test doesn't >> > use anything special in particular, so if it isnt running, a bunch of >> > others may also not be. >> >> The faq mentions something about fate-suite, and setting the --samples >> configure flag. >> First off, I don't understand why this is needed since I don't change >> paths except the install path (--prefix=/usr). >> Second, where is this "fate-suite", and why is it not part of the >> FFmpeg source repository? >> > > It's HUGE. HHUUUGGGGEEEE. And it's binary files. We don't want that to live > in git, it's not the right place.
Ah, so the only ones that are part of the repository are the small ones or the synthesized ones. That makes sense. > > >> And lastly, how can I set this up correctly? > > > configure --samples=/path/to/some/dir/with/lots/of/space, and then make > fate-rsync to download samples (or refresh), and make fate to run it. Thank you, an RTFM would also have been fine :). > > Ronald > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
