On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:46:44 -0400 Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Note that for the current SDL source code, 0 is always returned. > Nevertheless, this makes the code more robust. > > Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> > --- > ffplay.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/ffplay.c b/ffplay.c > index 79f430d..c143e96 100644 > --- a/ffplay.c > +++ b/ffplay.c > @@ -3814,7 +3814,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > SDL_EventState(SDL_SYSWMEVENT, SDL_IGNORE); > SDL_EventState(SDL_USEREVENT, SDL_IGNORE); > > - SDL_EnableKeyRepeat(SDL_DEFAULT_REPEAT_DELAY, > SDL_DEFAULT_REPEAT_INTERVAL); > + if (SDL_EnableKeyRepeat(SDL_DEFAULT_REPEAT_DELAY, > SDL_DEFAULT_REPEAT_INTERVAL) < 0) > + av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_ERROR, "SDL_EnableKeyRepeat(): %s\n", > SDL_GetError()); > > if (av_lockmgr_register(lockmgr)) { > av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_FATAL, "Could not initialize lock manager!\n"); How does this make the code more "robust"? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel