On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:58:50AM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote: > Hi, > > 2015-10-09 3:34 GMT+02:00 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc>: > > should i apply this ? > > i cant really say if this is correct or not > > though whie testing i noticed that > > rm ffmpeg ffprobe ; ./configure --progs-suffix=abc && make -j12 fate > > ends with > > make: *** No rule to make target `ffprobe', needed by > > `fate-ffprobe_compact'. > > Does that actually work even without the patch? I have the same issue
no, it doesnt work before either, its unrelated, i just stumbled accross it while testing ... sorry if i wasnt clear about that > and a lot of files in tests/ actually hardcode the binary filenames... > > -- > Christophe > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB DNS cache poisoning attacks, popular search engine, Google internet authority dont be evil, please
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
