On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:45:17AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:41:44AM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'd like to suggest a poll for the community in order to define some more > >> clear directions for the project. I plan to post the poll on the mailing > >> lists and IRC, people are free to forward them elsewhere. > >> > >> If anyone has a suggestion for a free & simple online poll, I'm listening. > >> A poll system where people can pick the importance of each entry would be > >> perfect. > >> > >> Here is the poll suggestion: > >> > >> Evaluate in the following list what is important and what isn't for > >> you in the FFmpeg project: > >> > >> - More bug fixes (please [+] them in the bug tracker) > >> - More test coverage to prevent regressions > >> - More "simple" features (new demuxers, new options, ...) > >> - More "advanced" features (high level API, scripting language > >> binding, filters rethinking, ...) > >> - More speed optimizations > >> - Better releases (LTS, more backports, ...) > >> - Overall cleanups (merge redundant decoders or dead/clumsy stuff) > >> - More API changes > >> - Less API changes > >> - Better API documentation (please specify) > >> - Better command line documentation (please specify) > >> - Other (please specify) > >> > >> I'd like to submit the poll by the end of next week. Comments on how to > >> improve this list are very welcome, as well as my initial request about a > >> poll system to use. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > > > > So here is the prototype: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/XGXPHXZ > > > > You can answer it now but I will reset the collecting and distribute it > > publicly if we agree on its current form. > > > > It will be published on the 3 FFmpeg mailing-lists and IRC channels. > > People responsible for the twitter account, G+ and others will be free to > > share it there then as well. > > > > You have 24 hours to make comments. > > 24 hours is IMHO too little. What is the hurry? Maybe at least 96 hours? >
People had time to comment on the thread already, but sure OK for 96 hours. -- Clément B.
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list email@example.com http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel