On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 7:20 AM Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Michael Niedermayer > <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > Hi > > > > ill make 2.8.1 soon from release/2.8 > > if you want something backported push it to release/2.8 soon! > > (or ask me to pull from your git tree, or if its trivial without > > conflicts then the commit hash to cherry pick is fine too) > > Can someone direct me to a doc on what should and should not be > backported? https://www.ffmpeg.org/developer.html#Criteria-for-Point-Releases-1 In my simplistic view, although e.g not all undefined behaviors are > exploitable, I still consider such things worthy of a backport as they > don't introduce any new features, and fix bugs. Similarly, I consider > all clean, simple bug fixes worthy of a backport. > I would agree with this view. Timothy _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
