On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> libavutil/avstring.h | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/libavutil/avstring.h b/libavutil/avstring.h
>>> index a306e89..a46d012 100644
>>> --- a/libavutil/avstring.h
>>> +++ b/libavutil/avstring.h
>>> @@ -339,6 +339,7 @@ enum AVEscapeMode {
>>> * @return the length of the allocated string, or a negative error code in
>>> case of error
>>> * @see av_bprint_escape()
>>> */
>>> +av_warn_unused_result
>>> int av_escape(char **dst, const char *src, const char *special_chars,
>>> enum AVEscapeMode mode, int flags);
>>>
>>> @@ -378,6 +379,7 @@ int av_escape(char **dst, const char *src, const char
>>> *special_chars,
>>> * @return >= 0 in case a sequence was successfully read, a negative
>>> * value in case of invalid sequence
>>> */
>>> +av_warn_unused_result
>>> int av_utf8_decode(int32_t *codep, const uint8_t **bufp, const uint8_t
>>> *buf_end,
>>> unsigned int flags);
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.6.1
>>>
>>
>> In the absence of any comments on this (or other avutil patches, in
>> spite of the general ping), the lack of a maintainer in MAINTAINERS,
>> and the inactivity/absence of a significant fraction of the people
>> listed by a git blame on this file, I took point 12 of the official
>> development policy and pushed the change.
>>
>> Please take this as a call to review the others if interested by this
>> weekend, else will begin pushing others at my discretion keeping the
>> development policy in view.
>
> Common practice in such a case is to at least ping a change that went
> without review once, just in case it was missed on the ML on a busy
> day.
I did do a general ping for the avutil stuff (on one of the other
patches), no response whatsoever. Unless you like a ping on ~20
messages in your inbox (perfectly fine with me), I thought pinging one
of them was sufficient.
>
> - Hendrik
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
