On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 02:42:55PM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote: [...] > > > Wasn't there a concern that these emulations don't behave identical to > > > the C library versions in regards to NaN handling? > > > I faintly remember something in the previous discussion. > > > > yes, i forgot about that :( > > i replaced them by FFMIN / FFMAX > > > > Sorry to raise this again but i htink it must handle NaN, or we need to > use a av_ prefix to define our own semantic. >
Derp. it was mentioned just above. Forget this. -- Clément B.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
