Hi, On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Vicente Olivert Riera < vincent.ri...@imgtec.com> wrote:
> Dear Moritz Barsnick, > > On 11/17/2015 04:20 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 15:07:56 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: > >> file. Do you mean the patch subject instead of patch name? If so, what's > >> the error? > > > > Indeed, the grammar: > > > >> [PATCH 06/13] MIPS i6400 core do has an FPU, so not disable it > > > > -> MIPS i6400 core has an FPU, so not disable it > > or with emphasis > > -> MIPS i6400 core does have an FPU, so not disable it > > (infinitive of "to have" following the third person singular of the > > helper verb "to do") > > That's right, thanks for the clarification. Does that mistake require > the patch to be resent? You can wait for other comments, i.e. you don't have to immediately do it right now, but I would suggest to resend it, yes. The risk of not doing so is that someone (e.g. me) scans over the mailinglist for approved patches to mass-apply all of them at once, and then I'll probably forget to amend the subject of this individual patch. Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
