On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Le nonidi 9 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit : >> long long is already being used in quite a few places in FFmpeg. There >> is no reason to list it as something to avoid. > > IMHO, most of these places should be replaced by more adapted types. With > modern C, having long, long long or short in the code is usually sign that > something is wrong because their size is not guaranteed at all and, > especially long, varies a lot.
Fine, don't really mind since for the foreseeable future, all long long instances may be replaced by int64_t. Just did not see a reason to single it out as being so important in the surrounding context. Patch dropped. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
