On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Derek Buitenhuis > <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 11/28/2015 7:51 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >>> In principle of course, e.g with more ifdefry, configure, or something >>> of that sort. I do not believe this is what he meant. >> >> I will await his reply to clarify, then. Perhaps do not write so >> matter-of-factly. >> >>> In any case, the point is moot - the implementations are not broken - >>> if they are, avutil/libm needs fixing as well. >> >> Now, yes. It would certainly be nice if this was noted somewhere in the >> patch notes >> (not necessarily in the commit messages). There are quite a few threads on >> the list >> from you now regarding tablegen, and it can be a pain in the butt / tedious >> to figure >> out how the current version differs from the N others. > > I assumed from the cover letter that this supersedes all such prior > stuff. Anyway, will attempt but can't guarantee improvements in > future. > >> >>>> Anyway, shouldn't this patce dropped, since >>>> 79abf2d0ded860acf505de22c4f7a750e5e98446 >>>> removed hardcoded tables anyway? >>> >>> No, if you actually read even the first line of the commit message, >>> you can see it was only for aac, not for this patch series. >> >> Indeed, I misread, and missed the 'aac_'. You could certainly be less of >> an ass about it, though. > > Sorry about that. Please do continue to call me out on such things; I > do not like unpleasantness on ffmpeg-devel.
pushed, thanks > >> >> - Derek >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel