On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:22:10AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:13:11PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > > > Le septidi 17 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Clement Boesch a écrit : > > > > From: Clément Bœsch <clem...@stupeflix.com> > > > > > > > > --- > > > > libavcodec/frame_thread_encoder.c | 9 +-------- > > > > libavcodec/pthread_frame.c | 10 ++-------- > > > > libavcodec/utils.c | 9 +-------- > > > > libavcodec/vp8.h | 9 +-------- > > > > libavutil/opencl.c | 10 +--------- > > > > libavutil/threadmessage.c | 12 +----------- > > > > 6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) > > > > > > No objection from me. > > > > > > > Will push soon > > > > > Nit: "avutil, avcodec:" or "lavu, lavc:" instead of "avutil: avcodec:". > > > > > > > sure. > > > > BTW, i think we should decide on av{util,codec,...} vs lav[ufc...] and > > stick with it. This inconsistency is triggering my mild OCD. > > > Hahahahaha :-D. > > Why don't you bofh us and tell us what to do and we'll follow? I nominate > you to be the review-bully and ensure people follow your rule. >
I'm using the av* form for historical reasons, but I'd prefer lav* one if that was only up to me. -- Clément B.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel