Le primidi 21 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Carl Eugen Hoyos a écrit : > I am glad we agree that there is no difference (license-wise) if > a library is linked statically, dynamically or via dynamic > loading;-)
You are, unfortunately, completely wrong. It makes all the difference in the world. Static linking is done under the distributor's responsibility while dynamic loading (pure dlopen()) happens under the recipient's sole responsibility. The only case where dlopen() would cause a license problem is if someone wanted to distribute a core dump of the resulting process. There is a very simple rule of thumb to apply here: can we build the ffmpeg binary on a system without libnvenc.so? If the answer is yes, then there is no way the license of libnvenc.so could affect the distribution of the binary. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
