On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 01:42:52PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:37:42AM +0100, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 22:24:08 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > + if (sscanf(str, "HandBrake %d.%d.%d", &major, &minor, > > > µ) == 3) { > > > + c->handbrake_version = 1000000*major + 1000*minor + > > > micro; > > [...] > > > + if (mov->handbrake_version && > > > + mov->handbrake_version <= 1000000*0 + 1000*10 + 0 && > > > > Really hard to read for all the '1's and '0'. You're checking for "<= > > 0.10.0"? Perhaps better to clearly document that. > > comment added > > > > > > So starting with 0.10.1, behavior is different? > > we have a file from 0.10.0 which is affected, i do not know if > later versions are affected, if somone knows or someone submits > files from later versions which are affected then this can be > updated
applied thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Let us carefully observe those good qualities wherein our enemies excel us and endeavor to excel them, by avoiding what is faulty, and imitating what is excellent in them. -- Plutarch
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel