2016.01.19. 19:00 keltezéssel, Bodecs Bela írta:
2016.01.19. 16:53 keltezéssel, Carl Eugen Hoyos írta:
Bodecs Bela <bodecsb <at> vivanet.hu> writes:
To retain the current behaviour and not to break any
earlier app, a new config parameter has been introduced.
Is the current behaviour useful or do you consider it a bug?
First I thought that it was a bug, but I borrowed an idea from
vf_overlay filter, where there is a very same config parameter causing
a very similar behaviour distinction on expression evaluation.
I will soon post a patch to vf_overlay where there was really a bug in
this behaviour.
So I think that the current behaviour is useful in some cases: when you
use expression but you want to have fixed sized output even when the
input frame size is changing.
(If anybody wonder why does somebody use expression instead of fix value
in this case? Well, if you write a script to handle many different sized
input file.)
For the new behaviour, I gave a usage scenario in my other post. And I
know that the new behaviour is not important for most of the users.
Additionally, most user do not care either behaviour because dynamically
sized video content is very rare.
This is the reason why I introduced the eval-mode option. So the user
may decide which behaviour is good for him/her.
So my patch has no risk for any current user but some of them will be
happy because of the new feature.
bb
Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
