On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:35:18PM -0800, Aman Gupta wrote:
[...]
> +static const char *charset_overrides[4][128] =
> +{
> + [CCSET_BASIC_AMERICAN] = {
> + [0x27] = "’",
> + [0x2a] = "á",
> + [0x5c] = "é",
> + [0x5e] = "í",
> + [0x5f] = "ó",
> + [0x60] = "ú",
> + [0x7b] = "ç",
> + [0x7c] = "÷",
> + [0x7d] = "Ñ",
> + [0x7e] = "ñ",
> + [0x7f] = "\u2588"
> + },
> + [CCSET_SPECIAL_AMERICAN] = {
> + [0x30] = "®",
> + [0x31] = "°",
> + [0x32] = "½",
> + [0x33] = "¿",
> + [0x34] = "™",
> + [0x35] = "¢",
> + [0x36] = "£",
> + [0x37] = "♪",
> + [0x38] = "à",
> + [0x39] = "\u00A0",
> + [0x3a] = "è",
> + [0x3b] = "â",
> + [0x3c] = "ê",
> + [0x3d] = "î",
> + [0x3e] = "ô",
> + [0x3f] = "û",
> + },
[...]I'm not exactly comfortable about using an implicit coding in the code itself... I feel like some character encoding at some random level (editor sender side, mail sender side, mail receiver side, ...) could mess up the encoding one way or another. Would you mind using the \u form everywhere? [...] -- Clément B.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
