On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:22:30PM -0500, Alexander Agranovsky wrote: > Thanks - any problems with 2/3? Or is it still pending?
i saw a case where it caused much more data to be read in probing i didnt had time to look yet so thats not a too informative bug report, dont even know if it is a bug ... > > On 2/14/16 8:53 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 11:49:06PM -0500, Alexander Agranovsky wrote: > >> mpjpegdec.c | 4 ++-- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >>0c761f422ba83446d20728449c0c6813e4e11560 > >>0003-lavf-mpjpeg-do-not-include-CRLF-preceding-boundary-a.patch > >> From b2ef061db32933e896dbeecb68268a62c47d6e0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >>From: Alex Agranovsky <a...@sighthound.com> > >>Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:16:45 -0500 > >>Subject: [PATCH 3/3] lavf/mpjpeg: do not include CRLF preceding boundary as > >> part of the returned frame > >applied > > > >thanks > > > >[...] > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >ffmpeg-devel mailing list > >ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > >http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Frequently ignored answer#1 FFmpeg bugs should be sent to our bugtracker. User questions about the command line tools should be sent to the ffmpeg-user ML. And questions about how to use libav* should be sent to the libav-user ML.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel