Hi,

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Wan-Teh Chang <wtc-at-google....@ffmpeg.org>
wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Is probably OK since it doesn't introduce new lock/unlock pairs, yes. We
> > typically don't care about a few bytes of memory.
>
> Hi Ronald,
>
> I just signed off this patch and submitted it in
> http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2016-March/190520.html.
>
> Does the patch need additional review? Could you approve and commit
> the patch for me?


Okiedokie, pushed.

Ronald
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to