On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote: > Przemysław Sobala <przemyslaw.sobala <at> grupawp.pl> writes: > >> I know it's a bit late but could you backport fixes for >> #4841, #4849, #5121, #5267 > > None of these were reported as regresions and I don't think > any of them describe a security issue. > Generally, backports should be held to a minimum to avoid > issues like ticket #5090.
The commit referenced in 5090 is clearly a new feature, and should never have been backported in the first place. Backporting simple and obvious fixes is generally fine and should be encouraged (only looked at 5121 and 5267, and those two look fine for backports) - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
