On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > >> People that don't speak up at all may approve silently (or at least >> not disapprove), someone that raised issues should give an explicit >> OK/Nevermind/whatever, agreeing with you or withdrawing his >> complaints, there is no "silent" option there. > > > This seems unreasonable, beacuse this way a silent person can block a patch > forever, which is not optimal. > > What I usually do is after a week of silence if I feel that I addressed the > concerns, or there is no known way to improve the patch, I send one last > ping explicitly stating that I will apply the patch soon. (whithin 1-2 > days). And if the silence remains, I apply it. >
If you send a mail explicitly stating that and the intention to move forward if no further feedback arrives, then its usually fine. Didn't happen here though. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
