On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:34:05PM +0000, Kieran Kunhya wrote: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 at 11:58 Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 02:18:32 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > +it is malice its rarely good to start with that as initial assumption. > > ^^^^^ > > , it's > > > > > +The goal of Software development is to create technical excellence, not > > for any > > ^ s > > > > > Let's compare this to the VLC code of conduct: > https://wiki.videolan.org/Code_of_Conduct/ > > Note how it has a list of specific violations, instead of vague things like > "Be excellent" that the FFmpeg one has. > Note how it has a huge section on disciplinary procedures.
i dont mind at all to be more specific, do people want a more specific list similar to vlc ? I thought it wasnt neccessary to write it as a strict "law" as if theres a nation of criminals that needs precissely worded laws. But rather a nation of good meaning people who all want to work together. the "Be excellent" text is identical to the linux kernel code of conflict. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/Documentation/CodeOfConflict > Note that this CoC should according to FFmpeg "rules" go through a vote, If there is no unanimous agreement then we should vote, yes. If there is unanimous agreement and noone asks for a vote then iam not sure, it might be better to vote anyway so everyone has a chance to equally state if they approve or disapprove [....] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into despotisms. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel