On 3 May 2016 at 19:16, Christophe Gisquet <christophe.gisq...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Btw, afaik, the padding is 0xFF, so expecting 0 in the buffer there > can't do the job. > > I don't get it, you keep saying that the padding must be 0xff yet the patch you posted puts 0x00. Where did you even read that the padding must be 0xff, I don't remember the specs saying anything about what the padding should contain. Though I agree that the encoder needs to generate reproducible files on any run. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
- [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fix VC-2 encoder Christophe Gisquet
- [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] vc2: fate tests Christophe Gisquet
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] vc2: fate tes... Christophe Gisquet
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] vc2: fate... Michael Niedermayer
- [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vc2enc: prevent rando... Christophe Gisquet
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vc2enc: preve... Christophe Gisquet
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vc2enc: p... Rostislav Pehlivanov
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vc2en... Christophe Gisquet
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vc2enc: preve... Hendrik Leppkes
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vc2enc: p... Christophe Gisquet
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vc2en... Rostislav Pehlivanov
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ... Christophe Gisquet