On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:07:45AM +0700, Muhammad Faiz wrote: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > benchmark on x86_64 > > cqt_time: > > plain = 3.292 s > > SSE = 1.640 s > > SSE3 = 1.631 s > > AVX = 1.395 s > > FMA3 = 1.271 s > > FMA4 = not available > > > > untested on x86_32 > > > > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> > > --- > > libavfilter/avf_showcqt.c | 7 ++ > > libavfilter/avf_showcqt.h | 3 + > > libavfilter/x86/Makefile | 2 + > > libavfilter/x86/avf_showcqt.asm | 206 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > libavfilter/x86/avf_showcqt_init.c | 63 ++++++++++++ > > 5 files changed, 281 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 libavfilter/x86/avf_showcqt.asm > > create mode 100644 libavfilter/x86/avf_showcqt_init.c > > > > I want to apply this patch but I'm not sure if it works on > x86_32 or not (I didn't test it on x86_32)
i had tested fate with it applied on x86_32 earlier today but i think this filter isnt tested with fate ... testing x86_32 is easy: --arch=x86_32 --target-os=linux --extra-cflags=-m32 --extra-ldflags=-m32 --enable-cross-compile [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The real ebay dictionary, page 1 "Used only once" - "Some unspecified defect prevented a second use" "In good condition" - "Can be repaird by experienced expert" "As is" - "You wouldnt want it even if you were payed for it, if you knew ..."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
