Hi,

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:24 PM, KongQun Yang <
kqyang-at-google....@ffmpeg.org> wrote:

> -- KongQun Yang (KQ)
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Kongqun Yang <yangkong...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Implemented according to the draft specification
> > > > "VP Codec ISO Media File Format Binding":
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.webmproject.org/vp9/#draft-vp-codec-iso-media-file-format-binding
> > > >
> > > > '-strict -2' is required to use this feature.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Not sure I really like the vpc name, when I read vpc I don't think of
> > > vp9, and the correlation to avc/hevc is also not really there, as
> > > those codecs are actually called that. AVC and HEVC, the C isn't added
> > > randomly.
> > > If anything, it should have been vp9.c then, but oh well.
> > >
> > > But anyway, if Ronald is ok with the name I won't complain.
> > >
> >
> > I think they intend to use it for vp10 also.
> >
>
> Correct. I don't want to limit it to vp9 only. I can use vpcc if Hendrik is
> more comfortable with that.


The atom is called vpcc, so I think that makes a lot of sense, thanks.

Ronald
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to