On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Kyle Swanson <k...@ylo.ph> wrote: > Hi, > > af_loudnorm currently links libebur128. The port makes sense because > libebur128 is tiny, MIT-licensed, has a good API, and would be useful > in several filters. Perceptual loudness has become an important topic > in broadcasting and audio in general, and it'd be nice to provide > these filters to everybody without having to link an external library. > > FFmpeg already has some ebur128 logic in f_ebur128, which I was > initially interested in breaking out into something reusable, but > found libebur128 was better suited for this. This was discussed last > month when the loudnorm filter was pushed, and also with the > expectation that libebur128 would be ported to FFmpeg. Briefly, > libebur128 allows several modes of measurement, custom channel > mappings, doesn't require resampling the input stream, is faster, and > has a reusable API. > > Thanks, > Kyle >
Hi, I'm still not clear if I should pursue this or not, I've received `yes` and `no` from both sides on this issue. Thanks, Kyle _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
