Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes <at> gmail.com> writes: > Plenty previous releases moved fields that were marked as "no direct > access", usually because libav added a new field above the > ffmpeg-exclusive ones (like AVFrame.channels, which is a common > candidate), and we didn't do such a song and dance to accomodate > everyone.
> I asked this in other threads before - why this time? I thought the difference is that for all other fields we offered accessors that the API users could use to access the fields. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
