On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:13:53PM +0100, Josh de Kock wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > Josh de Kock <josh <at> itanimul.li> writes: > > > > > + ret = openmpt_could_open_propability( > > > > I don't know anything about openmpt but what was > > wrong with the original probe function sent by you? > It probed one format, and not very well, compared to a lot more > formats probed by openmpt's. >
> > Iiuc, this code would slow down probing everything or > > am I missing something? > At first I couldn't get it to run quickly, but it runs much faster > now. It's still not a relatively fast probe, but it does probe quite > a few formats, and the demuxer has to be manually enabled, so > it's not like most people will experience a significant change. most people likely will be choosen for by their distribution as the people building themselfs likely are the minority what overall effect does this have on probing ? i mean before vs afterwards ? [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Concerning the gods, I have no means of knowing whether they exist or not or of what sort they may be, because of the obscurity of the subject, and the brevity of human life -- Protagoras
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel