On 8/10/16, Davinder Singh <ds.mud...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:35 AM Davinder Singh <ds.mud...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/commits/dev >> >> The Paper 2 algorithm is complete. It seems good. If I compare Paper 2 >> (which uses bilateral motion estimation) v/s motion vectors exported by >> mEstimate filter: >> >> $ tiny_psnr 60_source_2.yuv 60_mest-esa+obmc.yuv >> stddev: 1.43 PSNR: 45.02 MAXDIFF: 174 bytes:476928000/474163200 >> >> $ tiny_psnr 60_source_2.yuv 60_paper2_aobmc+cls.yuv >> stddev: 1.25 PSNR: 46.18 MAXDIFF: 187 bytes:476928000/474163200 >> >> Frame comparison: http://www.mediafire.com/?qe7sc4o0s4hgug5 >> >> Compared to simple OBMC which over-smooth edges, Objects clustering and >> Adaptive OBMC makes the edges crisp but also introduce blocking artifacts >> where MVs are bad (with default search window = 7). But I think it’s ESA’s >> fault. The paper doesn’t specify which motion estimation method they used; >> I have been using ESA. I think quality can be further improved with EPZS, >> which I'm going to implement. >> >> I also tried to tweak VS-BMC (Variable size block motion compensation) >> which reduced the blocking artifacts in VS-BMC area. Had to do experiments >> a lot, more to be done. >> >> mEstimate filter (ESA) + Simple OBMC: >> http://www.mediafire.com/?3b8j1zj1lsuw979 >> Paper 2 (full): http://www.mediafire.com/?npbw1iv6tmxwvyu >> >> >> Regards, >> DSM_ >> > > > > implemented all other modern fast ME algorithms: > https://github.com/dsmudhar/FFmpeg/blob/dev/libavfilter/vf_mestimate.c
Could you please squash your commits and attach patches that add vf_mestimate and vf_minterpolate filters? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel