On Monday, August 22, 2016, Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:27:12 +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > I have no idea what the result looks like, but perhaps "looks like" is > thinking too unhypothetical. ;-) Anyways: > > > +Clamp the first input stream with the second input and third input > stream. > > Perhaps: Clamp the first input stream's pixel values with the second > input and third input stream. > > > +Returns the value of first stream to be between second input > > +stream - @code{undershoot} and third input stream + @code{overshoot}. > > Same here. > > > +static const AVOption maskedclamp_options[] = { > > + { "undershoot", "set undershoot", OFFSET(undershoot), > AV_OPT_TYPE_INT, {.i64=0}, 0, INT_MAX, FLAGS }, > > + { "overshoot", "set overshoot", OFFSET(overshoot), > AV_OPT_TYPE_INT, {.i64=0}, 0, INT_MAX, FLAGS }, > > Could these not just as well be used with negative values? (They are > like constant offsets to the masks, right?) It could, but I dislike such idea. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel